<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here we go again&#8230; Clinton camp embraces the gambling industry as &#8220;economic development.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/01/18/here-we-go-again-clinton-camp-embraces-the-gambling-industry-as-economic-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/01/18/here-we-go-again-clinton-camp-embraces-the-gambling-industry-as-economic-development/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=here-we-go-again-clinton-camp-embraces-the-gambling-industry-as-economic-development</link>
	<description>Where La Raza comes to discuss its leaders, where you can learn about issues in Latino politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 23:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaelr</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/01/18/here-we-go-again-clinton-camp-embraces-the-gambling-industry-as-economic-development/comment-page-1/#comment-6476</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaelr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/?p=89#comment-6476</guid>
		<description>Well…now you know who is funding Hillary Clinton’s campaign.  I don’t know how you can accurately describe the gambling industry as economical development.  Especially in regards to the negative role they play impoverishing middle and lower income families.  As a woman and a self-described moralist, I wonder how Hillary rationalizes this in her conscience.  Then again her political behavior has always been the status quo, and never to the benefit of those in need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well…now you know who is funding Hillary Clinton’s campaign.  I don’t know how you can accurately describe the gambling industry as economical development.  Especially in regards to the negative role they play impoverishing middle and lower income families.  As a woman and a self-described moralist, I wonder how Hillary rationalizes this in her conscience.  Then again her political behavior has always been the status quo, and never to the benefit of those in need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

