<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denver Post reporting that Sen. Salazar accepts Interior Sec, but should we be concerned?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned</link>
	<description>Where La Raza comes to discuss its leaders, where you can learn about issues in Latino politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should President Obama Fire Secretary Salazar?</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-86744</link>
		<dc:creator>Should President Obama Fire Secretary Salazar?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 00:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-86744</guid>
		<description>[...] handle on this disaster, I felt compelled to comment about Secretary of Interior Salazar. Back in December of 2008, I had blogged about Secretary Salazar shortly after he accepted the cabinet position to head up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] handle on this disaster, I felt compelled to comment about Secretary of Interior Salazar. Back in December of 2008, I had blogged about Secretary Salazar shortly after he accepted the cabinet position to head up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Torres from San Jose</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26423</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Torres from San Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26423</guid>
		<description>Uhm I worked for Ken Salazar for his run in the US Senate...though he is not as progressive as I would like him to be, I respect him for being a very smart and capable individual. When he did an event in Pueblo, Colorado, he attracted thousands of Latinos. He is pragmatic and his qaulifications are amazing. Oh by the way, the Governor of CO is Bill Ritter a very moderate Democrat. He will not appoint a progressive. CO is not CA or Minn...its a very purple state. He will appoint Romanoff or Hickenlopper, not progressive but pretty liberal politicians for a moderate state. Great site by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm I worked for Ken Salazar for his run in the US Senate&#8230;though he is not as progressive as I would like him to be, I respect him for being a very smart and capable individual. When he did an event in Pueblo, Colorado, he attracted thousands of Latinos. He is pragmatic and his qaulifications are amazing. Oh by the way, the Governor of CO is Bill Ritter a very moderate Democrat. He will not appoint a progressive. CO is not CA or Minn&#8230;its a very purple state. He will appoint Romanoff or Hickenlopper, not progressive but pretty liberal politicians for a moderate state. Great site by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jammer</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26354</link>
		<dc:creator>jammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26354</guid>
		<description>How do you know he is a &quot;bagman&quot; for ExxonMobil and anti gay?  Never knew that about him.  I&#039;ll bet he would be surprised to know that about himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know he is a &#8220;bagman&#8221; for ExxonMobil and anti gay?  Never knew that about him.  I&#8217;ll bet he would be surprised to know that about himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaelr</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26343</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaelr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26343</guid>
		<description>Ken Salazar is a bagman for ExxonMobil…and a boring one at that, plus he’s anti-Gay which should openly convey a lot of things about him.  This bagman supported George W. Bush, and hopefully this choice is a political cause and effect maneuver meant to open up his Senatorial spot in Colorado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Salazar is a bagman for ExxonMobil…and a boring one at that, plus he’s anti-Gay which should openly convey a lot of things about him.  This bagman supported George W. Bush, and hopefully this choice is a political cause and effect maneuver meant to open up his Senatorial spot in Colorado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DfD</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26283</link>
		<dc:creator>DfD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26283</guid>
		<description>Okay. Anna, truthful articles are not bogus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. Anna, truthful articles are not bogus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jammer</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26240</link>
		<dc:creator>jammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26240</guid>
		<description>The Ken Salazar I know is a good person who is extremely proud of his Hispanic heritage, I have heard him refer to himself as a Chicano.  Not that it means a thing.  I  am proud to see a San Luis Vato on the Presidents cabinet.  I also know he will do an excellent job.  I for one am going to give him a shot at doing that job before I jump to conclusions.  Ok so Obama didn&#039;t select Grijalva.  Get over it.  We may not agree with all his choices for the cabinet, BUT if we voted for him then we put our trust in him.  Let him pick his team without second guessing every move by tearing down his choices whenever he doesn&#039;t pick one of our favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ken Salazar I know is a good person who is extremely proud of his Hispanic heritage, I have heard him refer to himself as a Chicano.  Not that it means a thing.  I  am proud to see a San Luis Vato on the Presidents cabinet.  I also know he will do an excellent job.  I for one am going to give him a shot at doing that job before I jump to conclusions.  Ok so Obama didn&#8217;t select Grijalva.  Get over it.  We may not agree with all his choices for the cabinet, BUT if we voted for him then we put our trust in him.  Let him pick his team without second guessing every move by tearing down his choices whenever he doesn&#8217;t pick one of our favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26219</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26219</guid>
		<description>If he posted the links, we would see what kind of websites these bogus articles come from. They are all off topic, so you should just delete them. They add nothing to the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he posted the links, we would see what kind of websites these bogus articles come from. They are all off topic, so you should just delete them. They add nothing to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26210</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26210</guid>
		<description>DfD,

Please do not post complete articles as comments. You did not write them, you are not adding any commentary. If you want to post an article, just submit the link (url).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DfD,</p>
<p>Please do not post complete articles as comments. You did not write them, you are not adding any commentary. If you want to post an article, just submit the link (url).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DfD</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26175</link>
		<dc:creator>DfD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26175</guid>
		<description>Secrecy Rules in L.A.&#039;s $24 Million Gang Program
Carr and Villaraigosa use 50 anonymous people to decide who gets the money
By Daniel Heimpel
Published on December 17, 2008 at 6:24pm
LOS ANGELES CITY GOVERNMENT, long unable to keep kids from joining gangs, is in the early stages of a program spearheaded by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa that he says will make a dent in gang-related violence and murder. 
A few days ago, though, inside a crowded room at Los Angeles City Hall, it became clear that City Council members who have touted the mayor&#039;s plan are in the dark, and the entire extremely unusual process for spending $24 million in taxpayer funds annually is emerging as one of the most secretive in modern city history.

Seated at a long conference table with maps showing the 12 city “zones” that the Gang Reduction and Youth Development (GRYD) task force plans to focus on, task force director the Rev. Jeff Carr explains that the new, $24 million program will differ from the L.A. Bridges program, into which City Hall poured millions of dollars before admitting that it was not closely tracking the children and could not prove that children were prevented from joining gangs.

The dismantled L.A. Bridges, designed by a squabbling City Council during the 1990s, badly failed. As L.A. Weekly reported in a December 14, 2006, article, “Broken Bridges,” City Hall ineptly funneled taxpayer money into the hands of a now-imprisoned gunrunner who claimed to have gone straight and peddled himself as a gang “expert.” 

Carr, a “social-justice” advocate and evangelical minister whose past efforts to deal with gangbangers have been mixed, promises major differences this time. He is limiting the youths reached through prevention programs to 100 children per zone. They will be chosen through a 53-question assessment tool Carr says was formulated by experts to single out kids actually at risk of joining a gang — not simply perceived to be. Outreach agencies hired by the city must meet with their young clients three times a week, and with the significant adult in each child’s life once a month.

Despite these structural changes, GRYD is already showing similarities to L.A. Bridges: Eight of 12 nonprofits selected are former recipients of Bridges money. Moreover, Carr and Villaraigosa insist on keeping anonymous the names of the roughly 50 people appointed by Villaraigosa to hand-select those 12 nonprofits, and even the names of the six Villaraigosa insiders who chose the secret group of 50 are secret. 

The secrecy is not only bizarre — Carr could name no other city doing it — but may itself create serious image problems if publicly funded GRYD runs into trouble. Carr says Deputy City Attorney Richard Bobb, who died recently, advised that anonymity be used so as “not to compromise the process.”

Carr concedes that not even the City Council knows the names of the 50 anonymous private citizens now telling the mayor where to award $24 million in antigang funds. “That is the one place where we are not being completely transparent,” Carr says. “Fair enough.”

Carr insists that nonprofit groups that apply for GRYD’s $500,000 “prevention grants” and $250,000 “intervention grants” faced a process so stringent that it eliminated “backroom deals.” 

The process is based upon awarding “points” to nonprofits identified by the anonymous private citizens who are assembled, roughly, into five-or-six-person teams in each of the 12 citywide “zones.”

For example, in Watts, the final contenders were the L.A. Conservation Corps and the Watts Labor Community Action Committee. Those two groups’ grant applications were reviewed by the five anonymous committee members, who in turn had been recruited by Villaraigosa’s anonymous task-force recruiters. According to Carr, sufficient knowledge of the gang problem earns applicants 10 points. Organizational capability, which includes adequate staffing and a history of financial stability, earns 20 points. An operational plan, including prevention services and a way to evaluate effectiveness, is worth 50 points. A well-presented budget earns 20 points. 

In Watts, L.A. Conservation Corps earned 84.25 points compared with Watts Labor Community Action Committee’s 82.75 points. In a second round, worth 50 points, both groups were inspected and interviewed by two members from Villaraigosa’s secret selection committee and one member of his anonymous six-person oversight committee. Carr says L.A. Conservation Corps won 33.5 points to the other group’s 32.83, so L.A. Conservation Corps got the city contract. 

Social worker Reginald Quinn and consultant Bill Burgess, both connected with the Asian American Drug Abuse Program, praised the mayor’s secretive selection process. After all, the Asian American Drug Abuse Program had just secured $500,000 in gang-prevention money and is putting in for another $250,000. Says Burgess: “This is the mayor’s baby.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secrecy Rules in L.A.&#8217;s $24 Million Gang Program<br />
Carr and Villaraigosa use 50 anonymous people to decide who gets the money<br />
By Daniel Heimpel<br />
Published on December 17, 2008 at 6:24pm<br />
LOS ANGELES CITY GOVERNMENT, long unable to keep kids from joining gangs, is in the early stages of a program spearheaded by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa that he says will make a dent in gang-related violence and murder.<br />
A few days ago, though, inside a crowded room at Los Angeles City Hall, it became clear that City Council members who have touted the mayor&#8217;s plan are in the dark, and the entire extremely unusual process for spending $24 million in taxpayer funds annually is emerging as one of the most secretive in modern city history.</p>
<p>Seated at a long conference table with maps showing the 12 city “zones” that the Gang Reduction and Youth Development (GRYD) task force plans to focus on, task force director the Rev. Jeff Carr explains that the new, $24 million program will differ from the L.A. Bridges program, into which City Hall poured millions of dollars before admitting that it was not closely tracking the children and could not prove that children were prevented from joining gangs.</p>
<p>The dismantled L.A. Bridges, designed by a squabbling City Council during the 1990s, badly failed. As L.A. Weekly reported in a December 14, 2006, article, “Broken Bridges,” City Hall ineptly funneled taxpayer money into the hands of a now-imprisoned gunrunner who claimed to have gone straight and peddled himself as a gang “expert.” </p>
<p>Carr, a “social-justice” advocate and evangelical minister whose past efforts to deal with gangbangers have been mixed, promises major differences this time. He is limiting the youths reached through prevention programs to 100 children per zone. They will be chosen through a 53-question assessment tool Carr says was formulated by experts to single out kids actually at risk of joining a gang — not simply perceived to be. Outreach agencies hired by the city must meet with their young clients three times a week, and with the significant adult in each child’s life once a month.</p>
<p>Despite these structural changes, GRYD is already showing similarities to L.A. Bridges: Eight of 12 nonprofits selected are former recipients of Bridges money. Moreover, Carr and Villaraigosa insist on keeping anonymous the names of the roughly 50 people appointed by Villaraigosa to hand-select those 12 nonprofits, and even the names of the six Villaraigosa insiders who chose the secret group of 50 are secret. </p>
<p>The secrecy is not only bizarre — Carr could name no other city doing it — but may itself create serious image problems if publicly funded GRYD runs into trouble. Carr says Deputy City Attorney Richard Bobb, who died recently, advised that anonymity be used so as “not to compromise the process.”</p>
<p>Carr concedes that not even the City Council knows the names of the 50 anonymous private citizens now telling the mayor where to award $24 million in antigang funds. “That is the one place where we are not being completely transparent,” Carr says. “Fair enough.”</p>
<p>Carr insists that nonprofit groups that apply for GRYD’s $500,000 “prevention grants” and $250,000 “intervention grants” faced a process so stringent that it eliminated “backroom deals.” </p>
<p>The process is based upon awarding “points” to nonprofits identified by the anonymous private citizens who are assembled, roughly, into five-or-six-person teams in each of the 12 citywide “zones.”</p>
<p>For example, in Watts, the final contenders were the L.A. Conservation Corps and the Watts Labor Community Action Committee. Those two groups’ grant applications were reviewed by the five anonymous committee members, who in turn had been recruited by Villaraigosa’s anonymous task-force recruiters. According to Carr, sufficient knowledge of the gang problem earns applicants 10 points. Organizational capability, which includes adequate staffing and a history of financial stability, earns 20 points. An operational plan, including prevention services and a way to evaluate effectiveness, is worth 50 points. A well-presented budget earns 20 points. </p>
<p>In Watts, L.A. Conservation Corps earned 84.25 points compared with Watts Labor Community Action Committee’s 82.75 points. In a second round, worth 50 points, both groups were inspected and interviewed by two members from Villaraigosa’s secret selection committee and one member of his anonymous six-person oversight committee. Carr says L.A. Conservation Corps won 33.5 points to the other group’s 32.83, so L.A. Conservation Corps got the city contract. </p>
<p>Social worker Reginald Quinn and consultant Bill Burgess, both connected with the Asian American Drug Abuse Program, praised the mayor’s secretive selection process. After all, the Asian American Drug Abuse Program had just secured $500,000 in gang-prevention money and is putting in for another $250,000. Says Burgess: “This is the mayor’s baby.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorH</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/comment-page-1/#comment-26164</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/15/denver-post-reporting-that-sen-salazar-accepts-interior-sec-but-should-we-be-concerned/#comment-26164</guid>
		<description>Webmaster:  Maybe you should write a post about Mexico’s law-enforcement community and so much of its old political establishment attempting to compete with remnants of Oliver North’s NSA/CIA/Contra cocaine importing hub still actively in business.  You can refer to documentation from Senator John Kerry’s Committee Report, which identified the cocaine related illegal activities of Oliver North and its connection to the U.S. State Departments distribution of funds to the cocaine trafficking Contras.  You can also utilize Gary Webb’s “Dark Alliance” series which ran in the San Jose Mercury News.  The U.S. taxpayer funding for the “War on Drugs,” has shifted its focus and is directly financing the federal government of Mexico’s attempts to eliminate its drug cartels which are all closely imbedded and related to that same Mexican government.  This is undermining law and order in Mexico, and that same federal government is now on the verge of imploding.  And all this has been directly influencing mass illegally and legal migration into the United States.  This would show how the U.S. government from the Reagan Administration onto the George W. Bush Administration has played a huge role in forcing illegal immigration into this country, and using that labor to populate the manufacturing hub to undermine the unions and drive down real wages for American blue collar workers.  This could also allow some of your commentators to properly list their comments under the correct posting, since illegal immigration seems to be the root of so much hatred between WASPs and people of color.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webmaster:  Maybe you should write a post about Mexico’s law-enforcement community and so much of its old political establishment attempting to compete with remnants of Oliver North’s NSA/CIA/Contra cocaine importing hub still actively in business.  You can refer to documentation from Senator John Kerry’s Committee Report, which identified the cocaine related illegal activities of Oliver North and its connection to the U.S. State Departments distribution of funds to the cocaine trafficking Contras.  You can also utilize Gary Webb’s “Dark Alliance” series which ran in the San Jose Mercury News.  The U.S. taxpayer funding for the “War on Drugs,” has shifted its focus and is directly financing the federal government of Mexico’s attempts to eliminate its drug cartels which are all closely imbedded and related to that same Mexican government.  This is undermining law and order in Mexico, and that same federal government is now on the verge of imploding.  And all this has been directly influencing mass illegally and legal migration into the United States.  This would show how the U.S. government from the Reagan Administration onto the George W. Bush Administration has played a huge role in forcing illegal immigration into this country, and using that labor to populate the manufacturing hub to undermine the unions and drive down real wages for American blue collar workers.  This could also allow some of your commentators to properly list their comments under the correct posting, since illegal immigration seems to be the root of so much hatred between WASPs and people of color.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
