<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Sotomayor&#8217;s relatively modest lifestyle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle</link>
	<description>Where La Raza comes to discuss its leaders, where you can learn about issues in Latino politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theKaiser</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36762</link>
		<dc:creator>theKaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36762</guid>
		<description>Ooo, that person… now I understand the comment.  And I agree.  But what a waste of an apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooo, that person… now I understand the comment.  And I agree.  But what a waste of an apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cholo</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36761</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cholo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36761</guid>
		<description>Of course not…you should know me better that that.  I am tickled to death that President Obama has nominated her.  I was referring to that person who doesn’t always take her medication.  And as a consequence likes to fill up this blog with a lot of apologist and fictional comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course not…you should know me better that that.  I am tickled to death that President Obama has nominated her.  I was referring to that person who doesn’t always take her medication.  And as a consequence likes to fill up this blog with a lot of apologist and fictional comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theKaiser</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36760</link>
		<dc:creator>theKaiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36760</guid>
		<description>“Hey…someone give me an apple, so I can stick this person onto a platter.”

Are you referring to Sonia Sotomayer with this comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Hey…someone give me an apple, so I can stick this person onto a platter.”</p>
<p>Are you referring to Sonia Sotomayer with this comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cholo</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36755</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cholo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36755</guid>
		<description>Hey…someone give me an apple, so I can stick this person onto a platter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey…someone give me an apple, so I can stick this person onto a platter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36690</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36690</guid>
		<description>http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/19672831/detail.html

Obama Administration Official Bars News Team From Public Hearing
Israel Balderas/KFOX Morning News Anchor/Reporter
Posted: 5:06 pm MDT June 5, 2009
Updated: 9:05 pm MDT June 5, 2009

EL PASO, Texas -- When local Hispanic farmers and ranchers from the El Paso area invited KFOX to cover a public hearing involving their discrimination complaints against the federal government, the last thing expected to happen was to have the door closed by a high ranking Obama administration official. But that&#039;s just what happened as the news crew tried to get their personal stories. &quot;It’s a first amendment right,” said Craig Hodgens, a local farm worker said, laughing sarcastically. &quot;I&#039;ve never seen it happen till today.&quot;

What Hodgens and about 30 other attendees experienced was government censorship. KFOX was the only TV station present at an Anthony, Texas family restaurant, where journalists were forced to leave. The closed door meeting was organized by the farmers. The federal government official doing the censoring was Joe Leonard, the new Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights for the Department of Agriculture. “I’ve attended other similar public hearings,&quot; said Leonard, “and the media was never in attendance.”

Not only did Leonard attempt to avoid the camera lens, in several instances, a government attorney who refused to give her name or title, tried to block the KFOX camera as well. The unnamed female attorney also was the one who closed the door on the news team. At times, she said the farmers inside the public hearing did not want KFOX to cover the event, but when asked if the reporter could ask the farmers whether that was true or not, she refused entrance. At one point, the government attorney invited a local print journalist to be the only reporter covering the event. But no other print reporters or cameras were allowed inside the public hearing room.

So, what was so secretive that mandated exclusion of KFOX? Alfredo Alvarez Contreras is a local cotton farmer. He told Leonard inside the closed door meeting how the Department of Agriculture admittedly discriminated against him and his farming colleagues for years. Speaking in Spanish, Contreras said, “We&#039;re all suffering because, you know, we&#039;re asking help from friends - lend me a tractor-trailer. We don’t have money and nobody is lending to us because of this pending litigation.”

The case Contreras refers to is a class action lawsuit on the part of Hispanic farmers and ranchers against the Department of Agriculture. The case was filed nine years ago, but the discrimination dates back to 1981. The Commission on Civil Rights, Congress and former Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman have all said that the federal government discriminated against Latinos in connection with farm credit and benefit programs. “For example, to plant cotton, you need the money in January,” said Contreras. “The government would give us money in May when it was too late to help us.”

KFOX contacted Howrey LLP attorney Stephen Hill based in Washington, D.C. He represents several farmers in the class action lawsuit against the government, many of them present at Friday’s hearing. When Hill was informed that the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights would not allow the news crew to cover this public event, he said, &quot;It&#039;s ironic that a government official working on civil rights denies the right of the First Amendment.&quot; He pointed out that during the confirmation hearings of Agricultural Secretary Tom Vilsack, he made strong encouraging statements that the Obama Administration wanted to settle the cases as soon as possible and be transparent about the litigation. &quot;Their actions today have not been consistent with those pronouncements.&quot;

So how long did this &quot;hearings&quot; gathering last? About an hour. When KFOX tried to talk to Leonard after the hearing about what he was told by the farmers and ranchers regarding the various discrimination instance plus comment on Friday&#039;s censorship he said he had no comment. Leonard did not want to talk to KFOX about the testimony uttered during the hearing. Leonard did say he had to go to other similar public hearings in other states, but no word on how public they will be. 
Copyright 2009 by KFOXTV.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/19672831/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/19672831/detail.html</a></p>
<p>Obama Administration Official Bars News Team From Public Hearing<br />
Israel Balderas/KFOX Morning News Anchor/Reporter<br />
Posted: 5:06 pm MDT June 5, 2009<br />
Updated: 9:05 pm MDT June 5, 2009</p>
<p>EL PASO, Texas &#8212; When local Hispanic farmers and ranchers from the El Paso area invited KFOX to cover a public hearing involving their discrimination complaints against the federal government, the last thing expected to happen was to have the door closed by a high ranking Obama administration official. But that&#8217;s just what happened as the news crew tried to get their personal stories. &#8220;It’s a first amendment right,” said Craig Hodgens, a local farm worker said, laughing sarcastically. &#8220;I&#8217;ve never seen it happen till today.&#8221;</p>
<p>What Hodgens and about 30 other attendees experienced was government censorship. KFOX was the only TV station present at an Anthony, Texas family restaurant, where journalists were forced to leave. The closed door meeting was organized by the farmers. The federal government official doing the censoring was Joe Leonard, the new Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights for the Department of Agriculture. “I’ve attended other similar public hearings,&#8221; said Leonard, “and the media was never in attendance.”</p>
<p>Not only did Leonard attempt to avoid the camera lens, in several instances, a government attorney who refused to give her name or title, tried to block the KFOX camera as well. The unnamed female attorney also was the one who closed the door on the news team. At times, she said the farmers inside the public hearing did not want KFOX to cover the event, but when asked if the reporter could ask the farmers whether that was true or not, she refused entrance. At one point, the government attorney invited a local print journalist to be the only reporter covering the event. But no other print reporters or cameras were allowed inside the public hearing room.</p>
<p>So, what was so secretive that mandated exclusion of KFOX? Alfredo Alvarez Contreras is a local cotton farmer. He told Leonard inside the closed door meeting how the Department of Agriculture admittedly discriminated against him and his farming colleagues for years. Speaking in Spanish, Contreras said, “We&#8217;re all suffering because, you know, we&#8217;re asking help from friends &#8211; lend me a tractor-trailer. We don’t have money and nobody is lending to us because of this pending litigation.”</p>
<p>The case Contreras refers to is a class action lawsuit on the part of Hispanic farmers and ranchers against the Department of Agriculture. The case was filed nine years ago, but the discrimination dates back to 1981. The Commission on Civil Rights, Congress and former Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman have all said that the federal government discriminated against Latinos in connection with farm credit and benefit programs. “For example, to plant cotton, you need the money in January,” said Contreras. “The government would give us money in May when it was too late to help us.”</p>
<p>KFOX contacted Howrey LLP attorney Stephen Hill based in Washington, D.C. He represents several farmers in the class action lawsuit against the government, many of them present at Friday’s hearing. When Hill was informed that the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights would not allow the news crew to cover this public event, he said, &#8220;It&#8217;s ironic that a government official working on civil rights denies the right of the First Amendment.&#8221; He pointed out that during the confirmation hearings of Agricultural Secretary Tom Vilsack, he made strong encouraging statements that the Obama Administration wanted to settle the cases as soon as possible and be transparent about the litigation. &#8220;Their actions today have not been consistent with those pronouncements.&#8221;</p>
<p>So how long did this &#8220;hearings&#8221; gathering last? About an hour. When KFOX tried to talk to Leonard after the hearing about what he was told by the farmers and ranchers regarding the various discrimination instance plus comment on Friday&#8217;s censorship he said he had no comment. Leonard did not want to talk to KFOX about the testimony uttered during the hearing. Leonard did say he had to go to other similar public hearings in other states, but no word on how public they will be.<br />
Copyright 2009 by KFOXTV.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhatThe..</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36647</link>
		<dc:creator>WhatThe..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36647</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ll just get another Corona...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ll just get another Corona&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36645</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36645</guid>
		<description>You got hard facts. He provided legal cover for torture, calling the Geneva Conventions &quot;quaint,&quot; and he wanted to fire the US Attorneys and replace them with Bush flunkees, much like himself.

You keep saying that this is normal, that other Presidents do this, but that&#039;s false. Many US Attorneys have served for decades, regardless of which party is in office.

I will say, though, that until Gonzalez resigned, the media made it seem like he was single handedly responsible for torture. He didn&#039;t write the so-called torture memo, Jay Bybee did, and he is currently a judge on the 9th Circuit, a lifetime appointment. He was approved by Democrats in the Senate. 

The media hate Mexican-Americans. We know that. So in that respect, I think they targeted Gonzalez more than the other people who were also responsible. Unlike the others who did what he did, and worse, he&#039;s a pariah. 

Reyfeo you support any Republican, no matter how criminal they are. Why???

What have these people done to help our country that would get you to support them? I don&#039;t think you even know that you&#039;re voting for. 

I really don&#039;t feel optomistic about the future of this state or our country. Arnold is taking a wrecking ball to this state. His ideal California is made up pockets of rich people who don&#039;t pay any taxes and millions of illegal workers making minimum wage and receiving no access to education, healthcare, or retirement.  In other words, third world.

That&#039;s what Republicans are all about, and sadly the dummies who for voted for Arnold aren&#039;t going anywhere. That&#039;s the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got hard facts. He provided legal cover for torture, calling the Geneva Conventions &#8220;quaint,&#8221; and he wanted to fire the US Attorneys and replace them with Bush flunkees, much like himself.</p>
<p>You keep saying that this is normal, that other Presidents do this, but that&#8217;s false. Many US Attorneys have served for decades, regardless of which party is in office.</p>
<p>I will say, though, that until Gonzalez resigned, the media made it seem like he was single handedly responsible for torture. He didn&#8217;t write the so-called torture memo, Jay Bybee did, and he is currently a judge on the 9th Circuit, a lifetime appointment. He was approved by Democrats in the Senate. </p>
<p>The media hate Mexican-Americans. We know that. So in that respect, I think they targeted Gonzalez more than the other people who were also responsible. Unlike the others who did what he did, and worse, he&#8217;s a pariah. </p>
<p>Reyfeo you support any Republican, no matter how criminal they are. Why???</p>
<p>What have these people done to help our country that would get you to support them? I don&#8217;t think you even know that you&#8217;re voting for. </p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t feel optomistic about the future of this state or our country. Arnold is taking a wrecking ball to this state. His ideal California is made up pockets of rich people who don&#8217;t pay any taxes and millions of illegal workers making minimum wage and receiving no access to education, healthcare, or retirement.  In other words, third world.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Republicans are all about, and sadly the dummies who for voted for Arnold aren&#8217;t going anywhere. That&#8217;s the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reyfeo</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36644</link>
		<dc:creator>Reyfeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36644</guid>
		<description>Again, this website doesn&#039;t seem to ever let me down...I wanted hard facts on why AG was run out of town and how his credentials were called into question and more importantly why the American Latino community didn&#039;t atleast flinch even if he is a Republican.  This shows me your bias.  You can be Latino, just not a Republican Latino is that correct?

Also, I find it ironic that you blame and question any Attorney Generals bias...Janet Reno was in Clintons hip pocket wasn&#039;t she?

Also, It is my opinion she is unqualified or better said not the most qualified, but Obama had to throw us a bone...in fact, I&#039;ve been silent, but after a few weeks reading this blog, even Anna was getting restless about Obama not showing us some Political Love.

So, again, I ask...why do we hate Albert Gonzales?  Did he not just follow precedence as all Presidents have a right to remove at their will any US Generals...isn&#039;t that what Obama has done...why aren&#039;t we crying foul now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, this website doesn&#8217;t seem to ever let me down&#8230;I wanted hard facts on why AG was run out of town and how his credentials were called into question and more importantly why the American Latino community didn&#8217;t atleast flinch even if he is a Republican.  This shows me your bias.  You can be Latino, just not a Republican Latino is that correct?</p>
<p>Also, I find it ironic that you blame and question any Attorney Generals bias&#8230;Janet Reno was in Clintons hip pocket wasn&#8217;t she?</p>
<p>Also, It is my opinion she is unqualified or better said not the most qualified, but Obama had to throw us a bone&#8230;in fact, I&#8217;ve been silent, but after a few weeks reading this blog, even Anna was getting restless about Obama not showing us some Political Love.</p>
<p>So, again, I ask&#8230;why do we hate Albert Gonzales?  Did he not just follow precedence as all Presidents have a right to remove at their will any US Generals&#8230;isn&#8217;t that what Obama has done&#8230;why aren&#8217;t we crying foul now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36632</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36632</guid>
		<description>“Lastly, no kids, divorced (or never married, not sure), and totally focused on her career, i’m not sure this lady can represent “all” Americans as a Supreme Court Justice.”

Sotomayor is divorced. But I agree w/ Anna. It shouldn&#039;t matter whether she has kids or is married or partnered or whatever. Condi Rice had no kids and wasn&#039;t married either, and she was able to serve in two Bush administrations. I don&#039;t remember people complaining about her marital status. 

I&#039;m of the opinion that some people should not have kids. Perhaps Sotomayor is happy being immersed in the law and likes being an &quot;auntie&quot; to her nieces and nephews. We already have a lot of people in our society who have kids when they probably shouldn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Lastly, no kids, divorced (or never married, not sure), and totally focused on her career, i’m not sure this lady can represent “all” Americans as a Supreme Court Justice.”</p>
<p>Sotomayor is divorced. But I agree w/ Anna. It shouldn&#8217;t matter whether she has kids or is married or partnered or whatever. Condi Rice had no kids and wasn&#8217;t married either, and she was able to serve in two Bush administrations. I don&#8217;t remember people complaining about her marital status. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that some people should not have kids. Perhaps Sotomayor is happy being immersed in the law and likes being an &#8220;auntie&#8221; to her nieces and nephews. We already have a lot of people in our society who have kids when they probably shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/comment-page-1/#comment-36630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/06/judge-sotomayors-relatively-modest-lifestyle/#comment-36630</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;Lastly, no kids, divorced (or never married, not sure), and totally focused on her career, i’m not sure this lady can represent “all” Americans as a Supreme Court Justice.&quot;

What a sexist comment.  Sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;Lastly, no kids, divorced (or never married, not sure), and totally focused on her career, i’m not sure this lady can represent “all” Americans as a Supreme Court Justice.&#8221;</p>
<p>What a sexist comment.  Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
