Comments on: Your tax dollars at work in Honduras

By: theKaiser

theKaiser — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:21:15 +0000

When you engage with morons, this is the kind of conversation that entails. El Cholo you should know better, and Michaelr, you should really know better.

By: Reyfeo

Reyfeo — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:20:53 +0000

Not really…you’re fruity and like small elongated obejects. Not hard to grasp where you stand. Thanks for playing.

By: El Cholo

El Cholo — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:01:56 +0000

Michaelr doesn’t have a couch, and neither do I. And we’ve never advocated for Zelaya, so there you go again…telling more lies. However, we do have relations with Dole Foods and Chiquita International. But all that may be too complicated for your small mind to grasp.

By: Reyfeo

Reyfeo — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:57:33 +0000

Lies? Everything I have stated is true, but since you haven’t said a thing in rebuttal, it shows your ignorance and or inablity to converse in open debate…BTW, I go/have been to Honduras in the last three months twice…I have business there and other countries in Latin-America. Seen first hand what the new Honduras is looking like since your punk Zelaya got his a$$ handed to him…Not sure how you would know more…? Try learning something from somewhere other than you couches…lol!

By: El Cholo

El Cholo — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:13:36 +0000

Michaelr, don’t waste your words with this cerebrally challenged hallelujah. Let him talk to the walls up there in Palmdale and ignore him.

By: Michaelr

Michaelr — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:54:26 +0000

If you engaged in conversation that would be one thing, however you seem to enjoy promoting lies. You represent what is typically touted in the Bible belt, and that thinking is regressive.

By: Reyfeo

Reyfeo — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:27:03 +0000

Enlighten us, what is it you know shows or proves my thoughts/discussion (ie Webby showed me an Article in the Honduran Constitution I had not thought about for example)…otherwise please stop acting like the liberal almighty and say something constructive…I understand these snippets from Anna, but MichaelR? You are really starting to lose stock value with your innate inserts–pitiful and typical lefty thinker with little value added to this (or any other for that matter) conversation…stop blogging, you’d be doing us all a favor…lol !!

By: Michaelr

Michaelr — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 06:37:16 +0000

I agree with your assessment there Anna.

By: Anna

Anna — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:15:12 +0000

Reyfeo, you are so lost.

By: Reyfeo

Reyfeo — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:29:13 +0000

Agree Webmaster…as of now, what I have learned (from friends in Honduras) is the Judicial branch is looking to convict the Military officers who went TOO FAR…Micheletti and current military officers have agreed with this as well…that said, his ousting of the presidency was on target and legal…Hondurans actually used democratic/constitutional precedence to rid themselves of what was another potential dictator/Chavez. Shouldn’t we applaud this effort?

Keep in mind, Honduran history led them to be very strict about never allowing the current term of Presidents to be changed…Zelaya, had attempted in numerous indirect ways to do this…the final straw was his referendum and so he was legally ousted.

The focus shouldn’t be on his removal out of the country but the reason for his removal in the first place (Art 239)…I can, however, see how this stains the legitimacy of his removal for breaking constitutional law (ie it just looks bad). He was bad for Honduras, the polls support this in Honduras, and I only wish the article written was less biased.