Has it ever occurred to you that Democrats might not pass much legislation when the GOP controls the House and the Senate? I’m sure Dubya was just waiting to sign one of Hillary’s bills into law to give her something to use to run for the White House. SIGH…

If you look at Hillary’s voting record, you will see that she has always voted to support women’s rights. Furthermore, she has NOT always voted with Bush. In fact, Obama has voted with Bush more than Hillary. He voted for FISA and to extend The Patriot Act. Why are you making things up?

And you blame Hillary for accepting Secretary of State, despite what you say are conflicts of interest, but you don’t condemn Obama for offering her the job. He vetted her and he hired her.

And I don’t believe that if she won it would have been a continuation of the Bush white House. That was Obama spin. He needed to link Clinton and Bush to position himself as a “change.” He also needed to make Hillary look old, rich and privileged to undermine the historic nature of her campaign.

If you had bothered to do some research, you would know that Obama has not changed Bush’s policies to a significant degree.

Wall St. is still unregulated and stealing everybody’s money, driving more states into insolvency. We are still in Iraq and about to escalate the war in Afghanistan. There is no change in Latin American policy. And of course now there is a rollback of women’s rights.

Funny, I don’t see a president Hillary Clinton letting the Catholic Bishops or Stupak tell her what to do.

What we have with Obama is a change in tone.

I think that all heads of state work for business sectors to varying degrees, but Hillary Clinton is running this State Department.

A lot of times, I hear people who complain about Obama say, “If only Hillary had won.” Well, we are witnessing how Hillary operates as a leader with her State Department management. She is just as embedded to the business interests as Obama probably is.
Maybe Latin America isn’t a priority for Hillary Clinton either. She’s the one that so many Latinos were hyped about, and I do think that how she used Hilda Solis in this situation is very disingenuous.

Because corporations, you know the people Obama really works for, stand to lose money if Zelaya is returned to power. Corporations want leaders in Latin America who will let them plunder the nation’s resources and exploit their people as cheap labor. Like Mexico. Zelaya was moving in the other direction, toward taking control of his nation’s natural resources, just as the much of South America is doing.

Lanny Davis, a close Clinton ally, is a lobbyist for the corporations who supported the coup.

I don’t know why anybody thinks that this is not also Obama’s foreign policy. Hillary is not some rogue operator. He appointed her after fully vetting her political and business connections. Latin America is not a priority for Obama.